{"id":95,"date":"2024-03-28T03:05:10","date_gmt":"2024-03-28T00:05:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/fasilali-calismalarda-kidem-tazminati-hesabi\/"},"modified":"2024-03-28T03:05:10","modified_gmt":"2024-03-28T00:05:10","slug":"fasilali-calismalarda-kidem-tazminati-hesabi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/fasilali-calismalarda-kidem-tazminati-hesabi\/","title":{"rendered":"FASILALI \u00c7ALI\u015eMALARDA KIDEM TAZM\u0130NATI HESABI"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

\t
\n \t<\/a>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u0130stanbul \u0130\u015f Hukuku<\/a>, Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun bulunan 14\/2. maddesinde \u201c\u0130\u015f\u00e7ilerin k\u0131demleri, hizmet akdinin devam etmi\u015f veya fas\u0131lalarla yeniden akdedilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 i\u015fverenin bir veya de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00fcreler g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak hesaplan\u0131r.\u201d denerek i\u015f\u00e7inin ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren nezdinde aral\u0131kl\u0131 olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesaplamas\u0131na esas al\u0131nacak s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden birle\u015ftirilece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. S\u00f6z konusu maddenin uygulanmas\u0131na dair esaslar ise Yarg\u0131tay<\/a> \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile ortaya konmu\u015ftur. Buna g\u00f6re aral\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n birle\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in;<\/p>\n

\u2013 \u00c7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren nezdinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131,
\u2013 Her bir fesih \u015feklinin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanacak \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi,
\u2013 \u00d6nceki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma sonras\u0131nda ara verilen d\u00f6nemin on y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fmamas\u0131<\/p>\n

gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 14\/2 maddesi, i\u015f\u00e7inin ayn\u0131 i\u015fverene ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak bir ya da de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrelerin k\u0131dem hesab\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden birle\u015ftirilece\u011fini h\u00fckme ba\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. O halde k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanmaya dair bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin hesab\u0131nda, i\u015f\u00e7inin daha \u00f6nceki fas\u0131lal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. Bununla birlikte, her bir fesih \u015feklinin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanacak \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi, hizmet birle\u015ftirmesi i\u00e7in \u015fartt\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin \u00f6nceki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 sebebiyle k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmi\u015fse, ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in iki defa k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denemeyece\u011finden, tasfiye edilen d\u00f6nemin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmaz. Ancak ayn\u0131 i\u015fverene ait bir ya da de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan s\u00fcre i\u00e7in k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmemi\u015fse, bu s\u00fcre ayn\u0131 i\u015fverende ge\u00e7en sonraki hizmet s\u00fcresine eklenerek son \u00fccret \u00fczerinden k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesaplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi halinde, \u00f6nceki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma sonras\u0131nda ara verilen d\u00f6nem on y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fm\u0131\u015fsa \u00f6nceki hizmet bak\u0131m\u0131ndan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesaplanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmaz. (Yarg\u0131tay 22. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2017\/25001 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2019\/20485 Karar Tarihi: 07.11.2019)<\/p>\n

Bir y\u0131ldan k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 halinde bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar da k\u0131dem hesaplamas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmektedir.<\/p>\n

Dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelerden, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fveren nezdinde iki d\u00f6nem halinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131 hak edecek \u015fekilde askerlik nedeniyle sona erdi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n askerlik d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ayn\u0131 i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etti\u011fi, birinci d\u00f6nemin tasfiyesinin s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131na esas hizmet s\u00fcresinin iki d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n toplam\u0131 \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, mahkemece ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n 1 y\u0131ldan az oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle d\u0131\u015flanmas\u0131 hatal\u0131d\u0131r. (Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2015\/16529 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2017\/18098 Karar Tarihi: 13.11.2017)<\/p>\n

Somut olayda; davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde belirsiz s\u00fcreli akitlerle 2 d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, 24.03.2003-10.11.2003 tarihleri aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n 1 y\u0131ldan az olmas\u0131 nedeniyle bu d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanamayac\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak i\u015fverence bu s\u00fcre sonunda k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin avans niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek her iki d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n toplanarak bulunacak hizmet s\u00fcresine ve davac\u0131n\u0131n ikinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n sona erdi\u011fi tarihteki \u00fccret seviyesine g\u00f6re halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1475 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n 14. maddesi uyar\u0131nca k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminatlar\u0131 ile 4857 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa\u2019n\u0131n 54. maddesine g\u00f6re izin \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilerek sonuca gidilmesi gerekirken iki ayr\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00f6neminin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 i\u015f akitleri olarak kabul\u00fc ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2011\/6107 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2013\/12213 Karar Tarihi: 17.04.2013)<\/p>\n

Belirli s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine dayal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar da k\u0131dem hesab\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmektedir.<\/p>\n

G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi, \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nun 14. maddesinin 2 f\u0131kras\u0131nda, i\u015f\u00e7inin k\u0131deminin i\u015f akdinin fas\u0131lalarla yeniden kurulmu\u015f olmas\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 i\u015fverenin i\u015fyerinde veya de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015fyerlerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 toplam s\u00fcreler g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak hesaplanaca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, i\u015f\u00e7inin s\u00f6z konusu i\u015fyerlerinde de\u011fi\u015fik zamanlarda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 da durumu de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyecek, k\u0131dem a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan t\u00fcm \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcreleri toplanacakt\u0131r. Kanun, fas\u0131lal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar konusunda hi\u00e7bir ayr\u0131m yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015f akitlerinin k\u0131sa uzun ya da belirli veya belirsiz s\u00fcreli olmas\u0131 bu a\u00e7\u0131dan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131mayacakt\u0131r. (Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu Esas Numaras\u0131: 2011\/9-484 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2011\/593 Karar Tarihi: 05.10.2011)<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren nezdinde fakat de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015fyerlerinde yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar k\u0131dem hesab\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmektedir. Farkl\u0131 i\u015fverenler nezdinde yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar ise hesaplama d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Genel kural bu olmakla birlikte i\u015fverenler aras\u0131nda organik ba\u011f bulunmas\u0131 halinde farkl\u0131 i\u015fverenler nezdinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar da i\u015f\u00e7inin di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilebilmektedir.<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin en az bir y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ayn\u0131 i\u015fverene ait i\u015fyeri ya da i\u015fyerlerinde ge\u00e7mi\u015f olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Kural olarak ayn\u0131 guruba ya da holdinge ba\u011fl\u0131 farkl\u0131 t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fi haiz \u015firketlerde ge\u00e7en hizmetlerin birle\u015ftirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Ancak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hayat\u0131nda i\u015f\u00e7inin sigorta kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda yer alan i\u015fverenin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka i\u015fverenlere hizmet verdi\u011fi, yine i\u015f\u00e7inin bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda birbiri ile ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 olan i\u015fverenler taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcrekli giri\u015f \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131kl\u0131kla kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Bu gibi durumlar i\u00e7in Dairemizin \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda \u201c\u015firketler aras\u0131nda organik ba\u011f\u201d dan s\u00f6z edilerek k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanma, hesap tarz\u0131 y\u00f6nlerinden aralar\u0131nda ba\u011flant\u0131 bulunan bu i\u015fverenlerin birlikte sorumlulu\u011funa gitmekteydi (\u2026 9.HD. 26.3.1999 g\u00fcn 1999\/18733 E, 1999\/6672 K.). Ancak daha sonraki kararlarda organik ba\u011fdan s\u00f6z edilerek sonuca gidilemeyece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir (\u2026 9.HD. 28.11.2005 g\u00fcn 2005\/34442 E, 2005\/37457 K.). Dairemizin bu y\u00f6ndeki kararlar\u0131 son y\u0131llarda istikrar kazanm\u0131\u015f ve farkl\u0131 i\u015fverenler nezdinde ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrelerin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131 noktas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilebilmesi i\u00e7in i\u015fyeri devri, hizmet akdi devri, as\u0131l i\u015fveren alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi ve birlikte istihdam olgular\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u00e7ok say\u0131da kararda vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u2026 9. HD. 22.10.2007 g\u00fcn 2007\/ 5762 E, 2007\/ 30979 K.). Ancak, bu y\u00f6ndeki yakla\u015f\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilerin yasal haklar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamada \u00f6zellikle davalar\u0131n uzamas\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda yetersiz kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle Dairemiz \u00f6nceki i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na d\u00f6nm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu yolla k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131nda organik ba\u011f \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde sonuca ula\u015fma hedeflenmi\u015ftir.
\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin alt i\u015fverende ge\u00e7en hizmet s\u00fcresinin (i\u015fyeri devri ayr\u0131k olmak \u00fczere), as\u0131l i\u015fverene ait i\u015fyerinde ge\u00e7mi\u015f olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.
Somut olayda, davac\u0131n\u0131n hizmet s\u00fcresi hesab\u0131nda hizmet cetvelindeki kay\u0131tlar\u0131n esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f ise de, s\u00f6z konusu kay\u0131tlar incelendi\u011finde davac\u0131n\u0131n 2004 y\u0131l\u0131 7. ay\u0131ndan 2005 y\u0131l\u0131 \u015eubat ay\u0131na kadar olana d\u00f6nemde farkl\u0131 i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu i\u015fyerinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyeri ile irtibat\u0131 Mahkemece ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, daval\u0131 ile aralar\u0131nda organik ba\u011f bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmemi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131n\u0131n buna y\u00f6nelik savunmas\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak s\u00f6z konusu i\u015fyerinin daval\u0131 ile irtibat\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konulmas\u0131 ve aralar\u0131nda organik ba\u011f bulundu\u011funun tespiti halinde \u015fimdiki gibi karar verilmesi, aksi halde belirtilen d\u00f6nem hesaplama d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131larak davac\u0131n\u0131n 2004 y\u0131l\u0131 May\u0131s ay\u0131ndaki i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n ne \u015fekilde gerk\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle 2005 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131nda ba\u015flayan 2. d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131yla birle\u015ftirilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekirken yukar\u0131da belirtilen ilkelere uymayan eksik inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile sonuca gidilmesi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. (Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2010\/39223 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2013\/2091 Karar Tarihi: 21.01.2013)<\/p>\n

Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta davac\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131 nezdinde d\u00f6rt d\u00f6nem fas\u0131lal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek dava konusu k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 talepleri hesaplanm\u0131\u015f ise de 23.06.2007-02.07.2009 tarihleri aras\u0131 Bulgaristan\u2019da ge\u00e7en \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fvereninin; daval\u0131 ile ihbar olunan \u2026 \u0130n\u015faat San. ve Tic. A.\u015e.\u2019nin meydana getirdikleri adi ortakl\u0131k oldu\u011fu, bu itibarla davac\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 i\u015fverenler yan\u0131nda ge\u00e7en \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 fas\u0131lal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma olarak nitelenemeyece\u011finden, 23.06.2007-02.07.2009 tarihleri aras\u0131 d\u00f6nem y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n fas\u0131lal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma gibi kabul edilerek davac\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmek suretiyle k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 hesaplanmas\u0131n\u0131n isabetli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re 23.06.2007-02.07.2009 tarihleri aras\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma y\u00f6n\u00fcnden s\u00f6z konusu d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin hizmet s\u00fcresi ve o d\u00f6nemin son \u00fccreti \u00fczerinden hesaplamaya gidilmeli ve dava konusu alacaklar hesaplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. (Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2021\/1401 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2021\/7667 Karar Tarihi: 06.04.2021)<\/p>\n

Aral\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalardan birinin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanmayacak \u015fekilde sona ermi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde bu d\u00f6nem hesaplama d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131larak i\u015f\u00e7inin di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmemektedir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 3 d\u00f6nem halinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek 1. ve 2. d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdini feshinin haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu, 3. d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdini feshinin hakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.
Davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 3 ayr\u0131 d\u00f6nemde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, iddia edilen 31.10.1995-31.12.1999 tarihleri aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n askerlik nedeni ile sona erdi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, bu sona erme \u015fekline g\u00f6re 1. d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanaca\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n 01.09.2001-16.08.2005 tarihleri aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en 2. d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 kendi iste\u011fi ile ve tazminata hak kazanamayacak \u015fekilde sona ermi\u015f olsa dahi 1. d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ile 26.11.2008 tarihinde ba\u015flayan 3. d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 aras\u0131nda 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre ge\u00e7medi\u011fi g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hesab\u0131nda 1. ve 3. d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 birle\u015ftirilerek sonuca gidilmesi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmeksizin ve davac\u0131n\u0131n askerlik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreye ili\u015fkin kay\u0131tlar getirtilmeksizin eksik inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucu yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 nedenidir. (Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No: 2015\/3819 Karar No: 2015\/5698 Karar Tarihi: 30.03.2015)<\/p>\n

Aral\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00f6nemlerinden birinin sonunda bu d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denmi\u015f ise bu d\u00f6nem hesaplama d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131lmakta ve i\u015f\u00e7inin di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmemektedir.<\/p>\n

Somut olayda, davac\u0131, daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 23.09.1981-25.08.1986, 14.03.1988-05.01.2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda iki d\u00f6nem halinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 askerlik sebebiyle sona ermi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131, ilk d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 sonucunda t\u00fcm alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair 25.08.1986 tarihli ibraname vermi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015fverene g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 20.01.2012 tarihli ihtarnamede de askerlik sebebiyle k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda bu d\u00f6nemin tasfiye oldu\u011fu ve hesaplama d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirir. (Yarg\u0131tay 22. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No: 2014\/6233 Karar No: 2015\/17394 Karar Tarihi: 14.05.2015)<\/p>\n

Av.Ra\u015fit ZENG\u0130N & Stj.Av.M\u00fcmine Feyza YILDIZ<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u0130stanbul \u0130\u015f Hukuku, Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131 1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun bulunan 14\/2. maddesinde \u201c\u0130\u015f\u00e7ilerin k\u0131demleri, hizmet akdinin devam etmi\u015f veya fas\u0131lalarla yeniden akdedilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 i\u015fverenin bir [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":64,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,20],"tags":[21],"class_list":["post-95","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-is-hukuku","category-yargitay-kararlari","tag-fasilali-calisma"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/media\/64"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}