{"id":94,"date":"2024-03-28T03:05:06","date_gmt":"2024-03-28T00:05:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/mehir-senedi-nedir-hukuki-nitelikleri\/"},"modified":"2024-03-28T03:05:06","modified_gmt":"2024-03-28T00:05:06","slug":"mehir-senedi-nedir-hukuki-nitelikleri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/mehir-senedi-nedir-hukuki-nitelikleri\/","title":{"rendered":"Mehir Senedi Nedir? Hukuki Nitelikleri"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

\t
\n \t<\/a>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u0130stanbul Aile Hukuku<\/a>, Bo\u015fanma Davalar\u0131<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/span>MEH\u0130R SENED\u0130N\u0130N HUKUK\u0130 N\u0130TEL\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/span><\/h2>\n

\u201c1-)T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu, evlenme s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda kar\u0131 kocadan birinin di\u011ferine bir mal veya para vermesini ya da vermeyi vaad edip bir s\u00fcre ertelemesini yasaklamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle, eski h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re kurulmu\u015f mehir, Medeni Kanun taraf\u0131ndan yasaklanm\u0131\u015f bir hukuki ili\u015fki olarak kabul edilemez (2.12.1959 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, 14\/30 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi). Mehr s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri bug\u00fcn de ge\u00e7erlidir. (\u00d6rnek: Yarg\u0131tay<\/a> \u0130kinci Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 25.10.1965 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, 4557\/5028 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131)<\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan; mehri m\u00fceccel, ileriye (evlili\u011fin bo\u015fanma<\/a> ya da \u00f6l\u00fcmle son bulunmas\u0131 haline kadar) y\u00f6nelik bir ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama vaadidir. Koca d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir ki\u015finin de ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama vaadi ge\u00e7erlidir. Ancak, bu durum, 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 128. maddesinde ( 818 say\u0131l\u0131 BK 110. maddesi) yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi yarar\u0131na bor\u00e7 alt\u0131na girme olmay\u0131p, TBK\u2019n\u0131n 288. maddesinde (BK 238. maddesi) d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama vaadidir. Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama vaadinin ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi, yaz\u0131l\u0131 olma ko\u015fuluna ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. (TBK m. 288\/1).\u201d<\/p>\n

(Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2019\/482 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2019\/3079 Karar Tarihi: 08.04.2019)<\/p>\n

<\/span>MEH\u0130R SENED\u0130NE DAYALI ALACAK DAVASINDA G\u00d6REVL\u0130 MAHKEME<\/span><\/h2>\n

Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Yarg\u0131tay g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc:<\/p>\n

\u201cBu durumda; davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi, mehir olarak \u00f6denmi\u015f olan (mehri muaccel) bir alacak de\u011fil, ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama vaadi \u015feklinde (mehri m\u00fceccel) niteli\u011finde, mehir senedinden kaynaklanan alacak talebine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemenin de kabul\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu \u00fczere, taraflar aras\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fme ili\u015fkisi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, aile hukukundan kaynaklanan alacak niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p, genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere dayal\u0131 ( TBK 286 vd.) alacak istemi niteli\u011findedir.<\/p>\n

G\u00f6revle ilgili d\u00fczenlemeler kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, taraflar ileri s\u00fcrmese dahi yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda re\u2019sen g\u00f6zetilir. Taraflar da yarg\u0131lama bitinceye kadar g\u00f6rev itiraz\u0131nda bulunabilirler. G\u00f6rev itiraz\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olsa bile re\u2019sen mahkeme, ilk \u00f6nce g\u00f6revli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 inceleyip karara ba\u011flamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; mahkemece, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde Asliye Hukuk Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek, g\u00f6revsizlik nedeniyle HMK\u2019n\u0131n 114\/1-c ve 115\/2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.\u201d
(Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2019\/482 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2019\/3079 Karar Tarihi: 08.04.2019)<\/p>\n

Aile Mahkemesi\u2019nin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Yarg\u0131tay g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cSomut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta; davac\u0131 12.10.2013 tarihli mehir senedine dayal\u0131 olarak, evlilik nedeni ile hediye edilecek ziynet bedelleri ile davac\u0131 ile davac\u0131n\u0131n anne ve babas\u0131n\u0131n hac umre masraflar\u0131 bedelleri ile salon kira paras\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsilini istemi\u015ftir. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki resmi evlilik ise , 12\/11\/2013 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ki\u015fisel mallar\u0131n iadesi T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 2.kitab\u0131nda yer almakta olan 226.maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Aile Hukuku prensiplerine g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Oysa; dava, Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince incelenerek karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Hal b\u00f6yle olunca mahkemece; Davac\u0131n\u0131n taleplerinin a\u00e7\u0131k bir bi\u00e7imde Aile Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revine girdi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek, g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 vermesi gerekirken, Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince yarg\u0131lamaya devam olunarak yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bu husus bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.\u201d
(Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2018\/7046 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2019\/4764 Karar Tarihi: 21.05.2019)<\/p>\n

<\/span>MEH\u0130R ALACA\u011eININ BO\u015eANMA \u0130LE B\u0130RL\u0130KTE TALEP ED\u0130LMES\u0130 HAL\u0130NDE TEFR\u0130K KARARI VER\u0130LMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/span><\/h2>\n

\u201cTaraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131-daval\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, kusur belirlemesi, yoksulluk nafakas\u0131n\u0131n reddi, tazminat miktarlar\u0131, i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 miktar\u0131, mehir alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n tefriki ve vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden; daval\u0131-davac\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan ise kad\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, kusur belirlemesi, tazminatlar ve vel\u00e2yet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

1-Davac\u0131-daval\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n mehir alaca\u011f\u0131 talebinin tefriki karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, yerinde bulunmayan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve kanuna uygun olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na, karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.\u201d
(Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2021\/7823 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2021\/8886 Karar Tarihi: 29.11.2021)<\/p>\n

\u201cDavac\u0131n\u0131n talebi, mehir olarak \u00f6denmi\u015f olan (mehri muaccel) bir alacak de\u011fil, ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama vaadi \u015feklinde (mehri m\u00fceccel) niteli\u011finde, mehir senedinden kaynaklanan alacak talebine ili\u015fkindir. Taraflar aras\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fme ili\u015fkisi vard\u0131r. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, Aile Hukukundan dayal\u0131 alacak niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p, genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere dayal\u0131 (TBK m. 286 vd., eBK m. 234 vd.) bir alacak talebi niteli\u011findedir. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, davay\u0131 g\u00f6rmeye genel mahkemeler g\u00f6revlidir. G\u00f6revle ilgili d\u00fczenlemeler kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, taraflar ileri s\u00fcrmese dahi yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda re\u2019sen g\u00f6zetilir (HMK m. 1, 3, 114\/1,c, 115\/1). O halde mahkemece, bu taleple ilgili dava hakk\u0131nda HMK 167. maddesi gere\u011fince ay\u0131rma ve g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken; hatal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmu\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.\u201d
(Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2014\/22932 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2016\/4548 Karar Tarihi: 14.03.2016)<\/p>\n

<\/span>BA\u011eI\u015eLAMA S\u00d6Z\u00dc VERMEN\u0130N GER\u0130 ALINMASI<\/span><\/h2>\n

Mehir senedi, ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama vaadi niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama vaadinin geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde ba\u011f\u0131\u015f vaadinden d\u00f6nmek ve mehir alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifas\u0131ndan ka\u00e7\u0131nmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Geri alma \u015fartlar\u0131 TBK m.295 ve 296\u2019da d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

I. Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flaman\u0131n Geri Al\u0131nmas\u0131
MADDE 295- Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flayan, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki durumlardan biri ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015fse, elden ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamay\u0131 veya yerine getirdi\u011fi ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama s\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc geri alabilir ve ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanan\u0131n istem tarihindeki zenginle\u015fmesi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcnde, ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama konusunun geri verilmesini isteyebilir:
1. Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanan, ba\u011f\u0131\u015flayana veya yak\u0131nlar\u0131ndan birine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r bir su\u00e7<\/a> i\u015flemi\u015fse.
2. Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanan, ba\u011f\u0131\u015flayana veya onun ailesinden bir kimseye kar\u015f\u0131 kanundan do\u011fan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranm\u0131\u015fsa.
3. Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanan, y\u00fcklemeli ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamada hakl\u0131 bir sebep olmaks\u0131z\u0131n y\u00fcklemeyi yerine getirmemi\u015fse<\/p>\n

II. Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama S\u00f6z\u00fc Vermenin Geri Al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve \u0130fadan Ka\u00e7\u0131nma
MADDE 296- Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama s\u00f6z\u00fc veren, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki durumlarda s\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc geri alabilir ve onu ifadan ka\u00e7\u0131nabilir:
1. Elden ba\u011f\u0131\u015flan\u0131lan bir mal\u0131n geri verilmesini isteyebilece\u011fi sebeplerden biri varsa.
2. Mali durumu, sonradan s\u00f6z\u00fcn yerine getirilmesini kendisi i\u00e7in ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc a\u011f\u0131r k\u0131lacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde de\u011fi\u015fmi\u015fse.
3. Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama s\u00f6z\u00fc verdikten sonra, kendisi i\u00e7in yeni aile y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri do\u011fmu\u015f veya bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015fsa.
Ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama s\u00f6z\u00fc verenin borcunu \u00f6deme g\u00fc\u00e7s\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirlenir veya iflas\u0131na karar verilirse, ifa y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ortadan kalkar.<\/p>\n

<\/span>MEH\u0130R SENED\u0130NE \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N BA\u011eI\u015eTAN R\u00dcCU DAVASINDA G\u00d6REVL\u0130 MAHKEME<\/span><\/h2>\n

Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Yarg\u0131tay g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cDaval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 erkek, kad\u0131n\u0131n alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu kabul etti\u011fi mehir senedine konu alacak isteminin ba\u011f\u0131\u015ftan r\u00fccu niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle mehir senedine konu 30 adet sar\u0131 liran\u0131n aynen veya bedelini talep etmi\u015ftir. Bu istek Bor\u00e7lar Kanununa dayanmaktad\u0131r. Talep, Aile Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yarg\u0131lama Usullerine 4787 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 4. maddesinde yer alan Aile Hukukundan kaynaklanan dava ve i\u015flerden olmay\u0131p; talebin incelenmesinde genel g\u00f6revli mahkeme olarak Asliye Hukuk mahkemesi g\u00f6revlidir. G\u00f6rev kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda re\u2019sen g\u00f6zetilir. Bu bak\u0131mdan, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 erke\u011fin bu talebi ile ilgili olarak g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken i\u015fin esesan\u0131n incelenerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015f h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.\u201d
(Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2015\/26750 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2016\/12334 Karar Tarihi: 27.06.2016)<\/p>\n

Aile Mahkemesi\u2019nin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Yarg\u0131tay g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cDava, taraflar aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan evlilik s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde belirtilen ve noterlik\u00e7e yap\u0131lan mehir senedi ile ba\u011f\u0131\u015flamay\u0131 taahh\u00fct etti\u011fi alt\u0131n ve e\u015fyalar hakk\u0131nda taahh\u00fctten d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tespitine karar verilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131, mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tasfiyesi ile ilgili herhangi bir karar\u0131n verilmedi\u011fi ve buna ili\u015fkin ihtilaf bulundu\u011fu, bu ihtilaf\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi i\u00e7in 4787 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 4. maddesi ile 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Meden\u00ee Kanununun 179. ve 225. maddeleri nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6ncelikle taraflar aras\u0131ndaki mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tasfiyesinin s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu, tasfiyeden sonra ba\u011f\u0131\u015ftan r\u00fccu \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, bu y\u00f6nden delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde aile mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.\u201d
(Yarg\u0131tay 20. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2015\/11764 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2015\/10759 Karar Tarihi: 06.11.2015)<\/p>\n

<\/span>BA\u011eI\u015eTAN R\u00dcCU DAVASININ BEKLET\u0130C\u0130 MESELE YAPILMASI GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/span><\/h3>\n

\u201cDavac\u0131; daval\u0131lardan Y\u0131ld\u0131ray\u2019\u0131n e\u015fi, Hakk\u0131\u2019n\u0131n kay\u0131nbiraderi oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131 ile ayr\u0131 ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, evlenirken mehir senedi d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, bu senette yeralan ziynet ve \u00e7eyiz e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n taraf\u0131na verildi\u011fini, daval\u0131 ile ayr\u0131 ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131ndan e\u015fyalar\u0131n daval\u0131n\u0131n evinde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu e\u015fyalar\u0131n kaybolmas\u0131ndan ya da ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan endi\u015fe etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak e\u015fyalar\u0131n aynen iadesine olmaz ise bedellerinin daval\u0131lardan m\u00fcteselsilen tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Somut olayda, yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrer iken, daval\u0131lar davac\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131\u015ftan r\u00fccu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flar ve bu davan\u0131n bekletici mesele yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, her iki davan\u0131n ayn\u0131 e\u015fyalar ile ilgili oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015flerdir. An\u0131lan bu davan\u0131n 24\/11\/2014 tarihinde daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 ayn\u0131 e\u015fyalar i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, derdest oldu\u011fu, eldeki ziynet davas\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesini bekledi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Kural olarak; bir davada h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi, ba\u015fka bir davada incelenmekte ve kesin olarak karara ba\u011flanacak bir hukuki durumun mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na k\u0131smen veya tamamen ba\u011fl\u0131 ise, mahkeme, o davan\u0131n sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131n\u0131 beklemek \u00fczere yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 erteleyebilir. Davalardan biri hakk\u0131nda verilecek karar\u0131n di\u011ferini etkileyecek nitelikte bulunmas\u0131 halinde iki dava aras\u0131nda ba\u011flant\u0131 var say\u0131l\u0131r ve biri di\u011feri i\u00e7in bekletici mesele yap\u0131l\u0131r. HMK.nun 165. maddesinde yeralan d\u00fczenleme bu \u015fekildedir.<\/p>\n

An\u0131lan ba\u011f\u0131\u015ftan r\u00fccu davas\u0131nda verilecek karar\u0131n eldeki ziynet e\u015fyas\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n sonucunu etkileyece\u011finden bekletici mesele yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir . Mahkemenin bu y\u00f6n\u00fc g\u00f6zard\u0131 ederek yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirir.\u201d
(Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi Esas Numaras\u0131: 2016\/14801 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2016\/12762 Karar Tarihi: 14.11.2016)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u0130stanbul Aile Hukuku, Bo\u015fanma Davalar\u0131 MEH\u0130R SENED\u0130N\u0130N HUKUK\u0130 N\u0130TEL\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u201c1-)T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu, evlenme s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda kar\u0131 kocadan birinin di\u011ferine bir mal veya para vermesini ya da [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":64,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,13],"tags":[19],"class_list":["post-94","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aile-hukuku","category-bosanma-davalari","tag-mehirmehir-alacagimehir-bosanmamehir-davasimehir-hukuki-niteligimehir-nedirmehir-senedi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/media\/64"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}