{"id":105,"date":"2024-03-28T03:05:46","date_gmt":"2024-03-28T00:05:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/davacinin-tanik-sifati-ile-verdigi-iki-beyan-ile-dava-dilekcesindeki-iddiasi-celisik-olup-bu-celiski-giderilerek-karar-verilmelidir\/"},"modified":"2024-03-28T03:05:46","modified_gmt":"2024-03-28T00:05:46","slug":"davacinin-tanik-sifati-ile-verdigi-iki-beyan-ile-dava-dilekcesindeki-iddiasi-celisik-olup-bu-celiski-giderilerek-karar-verilmelidir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/davacinin-tanik-sifati-ile-verdigi-iki-beyan-ile-dava-dilekcesindeki-iddiasi-celisik-olup-bu-celiski-giderilerek-karar-verilmelidir\/","title":{"rendered":"Davac\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 ile verdi\u011fi iki beyan ile dava dilek\u00e7esindeki iddias\u0131 \u00e7eli\u015fik olup bu \u00e7eli\u015fki giderilerek karar verilmelidir."},"content":{"rendered":"<div readability=\"164.6198156682\">\n<div class=\"mkd-post-info\">\n<div class=\"mkd-post-info-author\">\n<p> \t<a class=\"mkd-post-info-author-link\" href=\" \"><br \/>\n \t<\/a>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"mkd-post-info-category\">\n<p>\u0130stanbul <a href=\"\/kategori\/yargitay-kararlari\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>T.C. <\/strong><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>9. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Esas No: 2017\/13155<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Karar No: 2019\/22887<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Karar Tarihi: 23.12.2019<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili<br \/>taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik<br \/>Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Davac\u0131 isteminin \u00f6zeti:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firkette 05.05.2008 tarihinde i\u015fe ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilin i\u015fyeri<br \/>haklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demedi\u011fi i\u00e7in 30.07.2012 tarihinde daval\u0131 i\u015fyerine ihtar \u00e7ekti\u011fini, i\u015fyerinin ise ihtar\u0131 al\u0131r<br \/>almaz m\u00fcvekkili i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arkas\u0131ndan da 3 g\u00fcn i\u015fe gelmedi\u011fini bahane ederek ihtar \u00e7ekip i\u015f<br \/>akdini fesh etti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 08:00-18:00 saatleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilin<br \/>en son 1,800 TL \u00fccret ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Cumartesi g\u00fcnleri \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dini ve milli bayramlarda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<br \/>ak\u015fam 21:00\u2019e kadar mesai yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>\u00f6denmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, ihbar tazminat\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti, fazla mesai \u00fccreti, ulusal<br \/>bayram genel tatil \u00fccreti, asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Daval\u0131 cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u2026Noterli\u011fi arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011fu 019434 yevmiye nolu ihtardan<br \/>anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere davac\u0131n\u0131n tek tarafl\u0131 olarak i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini feshetti\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften<br \/>\u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u2026. Noter arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011fu 019434 yevmiye nolu ihtarnamenin<br \/>m\u00fcvekkil \u015firkete 03.08.2012 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkil \u015firketin ise \u2026 Noterli\u011fi arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla<br \/>g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011fu 016800 yevmiye nolu ihtarnamenin ise 02.08.2012 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini,<br \/>m\u00fcvekkil \u015firket davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fi b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihtarnameyi g\u00f6nderdikten 1 g\u00fcn sonra \u00f6\u011frendiklerini,<br \/>davac\u0131n\u0131n asgari-\u00fccretle \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkil \u015firketten herhangi bir alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu \u015fikayet sebebiyle i\u015f m\u00fcfetti\u015fleri taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan inceleme<br \/>ile davac\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm hak ve alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu hususunun s\u00fcbut bulundu\u011funu ve zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini, iddia ve taleplerin yersiz oldu\u011funu savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Yerel Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, toplanan delillere ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re, SGK\u2019dan celp edilen davac\u0131n\u0131n hizmet<br \/>d\u00f6k\u00fcm cetvelinden; davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n 30\/07\/2012 tarihinde kuruma bildirildi\u011fi, bu durumda<\/p>\n<p>daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 kuruma bildirdikten sonraki 31\/07\/2012 ve 01-02\/08\/2012<br \/>tarihleri i\u00e7in devams\u0131zl\u0131k tutana\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlemesinin beyanlar\u0131 ile \u00e7eli\u015fki yaratm\u0131\u015f ise de; davac\u0131n\u0131n,<br \/>daval\u0131ya g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 30\/07\/2012 tarihli ihtarname ile \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmemesi nedeniyle i\u015f akdini<br \/>eylemli olarak 30\/07\/2012 tarihinde sona erdirdi\u011fi, dinlenen davac\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde maa\u015flar\u0131n<br \/>son zamanlarda eksik \u00f6dendi\u011fini beyan ettikleri, dosyam\u0131z\u0131n tevdii edildi\u011fi bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan<br \/>davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmeyen y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti ve fazla mesai gibi bir k\u0131s\u0131m<br \/>i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nun 24\/II-e bendinde; i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f\u00e7inin<br \/>\u00fccreti (fazla mesai, hafta tatili, genel tatil alacaklar\u0131 gibi\u2026) kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri veya s\u00f6zle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na<br \/>uygun olarak hesap edilmez ve \u00f6denmez ise i\u015f\u00e7iye hakl\u0131 nedenle fesih hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n 4<br \/>y\u0131ldan fazla bir s\u00fcredir daval\u0131 i\u015fveren yan\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, 4 y\u0131ldan fazla k\u0131demi bulunan bir i\u015f\u00e7inin<br \/>\u00fclkemizdeki mevcut ekonomi g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckler ve i\u015f bulmadaki zorluklar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, hakl\u0131 neden<br \/>olmaks\u0131z\u0131n tazminat haklar\u0131na engel olacak \u015fekilde i\u015f b\u0131rakmas\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131<br \/>oldu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, aktin feshi konusunda ispat y\u00fck\u00fc \u00fczerinde olan daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fc<br \/>yerine getiremedi\u011fi ve i\u015f akdinin davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan haketti\u011fi bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik hak ve alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>\u00f6denmemesi hakl\u0131 nedeniyle 30\/07\/2012 tarihinde eylemli olarak sona erdirildi\u011fi kanaatine var\u0131larak;<br \/>davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ile \u00f6denmeyen y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti, fazla mesai ve ulusal bayram ve genel tatil<br \/>\u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesine, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmeyen asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alaca\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan<br \/>asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin talebinin reddine, \u00f6te yandan i\u015f akdini hakl\u0131 nedenle de olsa<br \/>feshden taraf ihbar tazminat\u0131na hak kazanamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan ihbar tazminat\u0131na ili\u015fkin talebinin reddine<br \/>karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n talep etti\u011fi i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131<br \/>amac\u0131yla dosyam\u0131z bilirki\u015filer S.D.\u0130. ve B.\u00c7.\u2018a tevdi edilmi\u015f olup, bu bilirki\u015filerce d\u00fczenlenen<br \/>raporlara taraf vekillerinin itirazlar\u0131 ve raporlar aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dosyan\u0131n<br \/>bilirki\u015fi \u2026.\u2019e tevdii edildi\u011fi, bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131n\u0131n Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan usul ve yasaya uygun<br \/>bulundu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile, bilirki\u015fi\u2026. taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 09\/11\/2015 tarihli<br \/>raporda hesaplanan miktarlar \u00fczerinden davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, hafta tatili ve fazla mesai<br \/>\u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmesine, 01\/02\/2005 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda hesaplanan miktar \u00fczerinden davac\u0131ya<br \/>haketti\u011fi y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmesine, \u00f6te yandan davac\u0131n\u0131n asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin talebinin reddine karar<br \/>verilmesi gerekti\u011fi, davac\u0131 vekilinin Mahkememize a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu davas\u0131n\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esinde<br \/>HMK\u2019n\u0131n 107. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak nitelendirdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup; bu<br \/>konudaki mevcut Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinin<br \/>yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir olgunun tespit edilmesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olmas\u0131 durumunda alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz<br \/>oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n ve tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n hak kazanma ve hesap<br \/>y\u00f6ntemi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden pek \u00e7ok etkene ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak de\u011fi\u015fkenlik g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, \u0130\u015f hukukundaki i\u015fveren taraf\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>bask\u0131n konumu nedeniyle \u00f6zellikle ayl\u0131k \u00fccretin belirlenmesi konusundaki mevcut zorluklar ve<br \/>giydirilmi\u015f \u00fccretin tespitinin taraflar aras\u0131nda ihtilafl\u0131 olmas\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015fe giri\u015f \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f tarihi, fazla mesai,<br \/>y\u0131ll\u0131k izin ve genel tatil \u00fccreti gibi alacak kalemlerinin hesaplanmas\u0131nda \u00fclkemize has g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckler de<br \/>dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; davam\u0131za konu alacak kalemlerinin belirsiz olarak kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi,<br \/>belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 ise; mevcut yasal d\u00fczenleme \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00fc\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fik \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi, eda<br \/>(tahsil talebi ile) davas\u0131 niteli\u011finde belirsiz alacak davas\u0131, tespit niteli\u011finde belirsiz alacak davas\u0131<br \/>a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi gibi k\u0131smi eda k\u00fclli tespit \u015feklinde belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 da a\u00e7abilir. Her bir dava t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn<br \/>farkl\u0131 \u00f6zellikleri bulundu\u011fu, belirsiz alacak davas\u0131nda bir miktar\u0131n tahsili yan\u0131nda, kalan tutar\u0131n tespiti<br \/>istenebilecek ve yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda belirlendi\u011finde kalan miktar da talep edilebilece\u011fi, somut<br \/>olay\u0131m\u0131zda alacakl\u0131 i\u015fveren veya resmi kurum kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda ge\u00e7en belirleyebildi\u011fi miktar\u0131 davaya konu<br \/>etmek yerine, farazi bir miktarlar i\u00e7in (500 TL, 100 TL gibi) talepte bulundu\u011fu, bu nedenle de;<br \/>davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smi eda k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, k\u0131smi eda k\u00fclli tespit davas\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anda alaca\u011f\u0131n tamam\u0131 i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 kesilece\u011fi, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki i\u015fleminden veya<br \/>h\u00e2kimin her karar\u0131ndan sonra yeniden i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131ndan yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda alaca\u011f\u0131n<br \/>zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, bu nedenle yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda artt\u0131r\u0131lan taleplere kar\u015f\u0131<br \/>yap\u0131lan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi sonuca etkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak faiz ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan davaya konu edilen<br \/>miktar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dava tarihi kabul edilmi\u015f olup, alaca\u011f\u0131n kalan k\u0131sm\u0131n sadece tespiti istenmi\u015f<br \/>olmakla, belirlenen bakiye alacak miktar\u0131n\u0131n talep edildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren faize karar verilmesi<br \/>kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile ihbar tazminat\u0131 ve asgari ge\u00e7im indirimi haricindeki taleplerin<br \/>kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Temyiz:<\/strong><br \/>Karar s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gerek\u00e7e:<\/strong><br \/>1- Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br \/>2- Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan;<br \/>Davac\u0131 tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 ile ifade verdi\u011fi \u2026\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2012\/862 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda; \u201cy\u0131ll\u0131k izin<br \/>kullan\u0131yorduk, ancak par\u00e7al\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131yorduk.\u201d y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ifade vermi\u015ftir. Ancak, dosyadaki tek<br \/>y\u0131ll\u0131k izin belgesinde 1 kere ve b\u00fct\u00fcn halinde y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kullan\u0131m\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnmektedir.<br \/>Davac\u0131 tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 ile ifade verdi\u011fi \u2026 \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2013\/275 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda; \u201c\u0130\u015fyerinde<br \/>y\u0131ll\u0131k izin uygulamas\u0131 vard\u0131. Fakat tam olarak kullanam\u0131yorduk.\u201d y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ifade vermi\u015ftir.<br \/>Dava dilek\u00e7esinde ise davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre boyunca y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<br \/>Davac\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 ile verdi\u011fi iki beyan ile dava dilek\u00e7esindeki iddia \u00e7eli\u015fiktir.<br \/>Bu nedenle, davac\u0131 asil duru\u015fmaya bizzat davet edilerek yukar\u0131daki hususlar ve \u00e7eli\u015fkiler kendisine<br \/>a\u00e7\u0131klanmal\u0131, davac\u0131dan \u00e7eli\u015fkilerin nedenleri ve y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kullanma durumu a\u00e7\u0131klat\u0131lmal\u0131, beyanlar\u0131<br \/>irdelenerek y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda bir sonuca var\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<br \/>Davac\u0131 lehine h\u00fckmedilen y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131 net 1300 TL \/ br\u00fct 1683,24 TL \u00fccret esas al\u0131narak<br \/>hesaplanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br \/>Oysa, h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer alacaklar olan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, fazla mesai \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram genel<br \/>tatil \u00fccreti net 889,79 TL \/ br\u00fct 1131,20 TL \u00fccret \u00fczerinden hesaplanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br \/>Bu \u015fekilde \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<br \/>Davac\u0131 temyizi de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti de net 889,79 TL \/ br\u00fct 1131,20 TL \u00fccret<br \/>\u00fczerinden hesaplanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SONU\u00c7:<\/strong><br \/>Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebeplerden dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz<br \/>harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, 23\/12\/2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130stanbul Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131 T.C. YARGITAY 9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No: 2017\/13155 Karar No: 2019\/22887 Karar Tarihi: 23.12.2019 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":64,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[31],"class_list":["post-105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-yargitay-kararlari","tag-celiskidavacidavaliihtaris-davasiis-davasinda-tanikiscilik-alacagitaniktanik-beyani"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/media\/64"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ismailbor.av.tr\/jsonlar\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}